What was missing from the BBC Panorama exploration of domestic violence

by Dr Elizabeth A. Bates

Any mainstream and popular TV programme that highlights the issue of domestic violence is welcome.   Domestic violence is a significant social issue that has significant physical and mental health impacts for the men, women and children involved. That being said, when programmes highlight the issue but continue to perpetuate stereotypes and myths about the gendered nature of domestic violence, then it is likely to have some adverse effects.

BBC’s Panorama on Monday night raised the question about whether violent men can change, and explored the use and effectiveness of perpetrator programmes in changing behaviour. It was thought provoking and interesting, but to me, there were some significant omissions of information that would have contributed to the discussion.

As highlighted in the programme, there are issues with our understanding of how effective perpetrator programmes can be in changing behaviour. These issues include a lack of long-term follow ups, a lack of independent evaluations and a lack of evidence informed practice (see Bates, Graham-Kevan, Bolam & Thornton, 2017 for a full discussion). Within the Panorama programme one non-gendered perpetrator programme was presented, but there was a noticeable lack of discussion on the current theoretical models that underpin the majority of other perpetrator programmes that are accredited and funded within the UK.

The Duluth model was established in the United States in 1981 as an intervention with a curriculum developed by activists within the battered women’s movement and five battered women (Pence & Paymar, 1993). They believed that domestic violence was caused by men’s patriarchal ideology and beliefs about male privilege, as well as women’s lack of power and equality.  Research has been consistent in demonstrating the widespread use of this model whilst also indicating a lack of effectiveness of this programme. It is still influential in policy and practice within the UK, US and Canada, despite a wealth of literature that demonstrates its lack of success in changing behaviour, and its ignorance to other factors that are predictive of domestic violence perpetration (e.g., adverse childhood experiences), as well as the prevalence of bidirectional/mutual abuse.

The lack of evidence-based practice in the area of domestic violence is almost unique. The Duluth model has a noticeable “immunity” from needing to answer to any external empirical evaluation (Corvo, Dutton & Chen, 2008; p.112).  Over ten years ago, Dutton (2006) reviewed both the model’s lack of efficacy and the wealth of evidence contradicting its feminist foundations, concluding that its continued use is impeding effective treatment and judicial responses.  Despite the weight of evidence, the Duluth model continues to be influential now.

Whilst in the opening scenes of the Panorama programme the narrator is heard talking about the number of women and men who experience domestic violence, this is the only real mention of the issue of male victims, and there is indeed no discussion of violence by women at all.   The impact of not including female perpetrators and male victims in this narrative is two-fold; it impacts firstly on men who are experiencing abuse, and creates more barriers to their help-seeking. Men often do not disclose their own victimisation, and in part this could be seen to be impacted by more general issues men have help-seeking related to the construction of the male gender role. However beyond that, other issues that impact help-seeking include the fact that men often assume they simply cannot be victims of domestic violence, because they don’t have a concept of men as being victims of violence from women. In awareness raising campaigns, in the media, and in general societal narratives, domestic violence is discussed as overwhelmingly an issue of men’s violence towards women, creating the image that only women are victims. Services and support organisations often are perceived to be either not appropriate for men or commonly not available. Furthermore, where men have disclosed their victimisation they have often experienced humiliation through being laughed at, blamed and accused of causing the violence, accused of being the perpetrator, or told to “man up” and handle it.  Perceptions of the general public are important and impactful; the stigma associated with being a male victim of domestic violence can be really damaging.  ManKind made a video to highlight just how different people’s perceptions are, by comparing the reactions to a male and female victim – see the video here.

A second issue with not including female perpetrators in this narrative is that it negatively impacts on women who are violent and are left with few options for getting help and support in changing their behaviour.  The academic literature demonstrates there are significant similarities in the factors that predict men’s and women’s violence, and these can include trauma and adverse childhood experiences, attachment issues, personality traits and disorders and many other issues.  BBC’s Panorama failed to highlight that there are abusive women who do not currently have access to intervention that could help their behaviour change.  In part this could be attributed to the fact these women do not come into contact with the criminal justice system because men often don’t report women’s violence, women’s violence is not always taken seriously, or the rigid dichotomy of having to assign perpetrator and victim labels in situations where there is bidirectional violence.

Moving away from a one-size-fits-all, gendered approach would not only allow intervention to be matched to risk and need, but it would create opportunities to develop evidence-based programmes that can be used with all perpetrators including men and women in opposite-sex relationships and members of the LGBTQ+ population.  With the increased evidence base detailing both women’s perpetration and the prevalence of bidirectional IPV, there is a need to work with perpetrator and victim groups across the gender and sexuality spectrums to ensure we are developing interventions that are inclusive and effective.  This must then be reflected in the narrative we construct in the media, in order to start the process of change in how we recognise and support those impacted by domestic violence. The Panorama programme last night reflects a lost opportunity to make a positive step forward in addressing our outdated stereotypes about domestic violence.

About the author

Dr Elizabeth Bates is a Senior Lecturer in Psychology at the University of Cumbria and a Chartered Psychologist. Her research explores men’s experiences of domestic violence including barriers to help-seeking and post-separation recovery. Dr Bates is also a trustee with the male victims charity ManKind Initiative.

6 thoughts on “What was missing from the BBC Panorama exploration of domestic violence

  1. Reply
    Andrew Briggs - October 9, 2018

    Liz this is spot on. Over they years I have been very aware of the limitations of models that don’t include the bi-directionality of domestic violence. In my own work with couples I help them identify the dynamic that keeps one in a victim role whilst the other is seen as the perpetrator. Quite often this helps us see that the victim, through projecting aggression, makes the perpetrator the perpetrator by proxy. Obviously this is not always the case but nearly always the victim (again, male or female) is passively aggressive to the point of brining about violence in the other.

  2. Reply
    Tim - October 9, 2018

    Thank you for this excellent evaluation. Only a few days ago I was speaking with someone who works with victims of domestic abuse who insisted that the way I was abused by my ex-wife was patriarchal. I asked how that could possibly be so, because it was about abuse committed by a woman. She explained that it was because I wasn’t behaving like a man. I said it made no sense to me at all, but whatever I said she couldn’t understand. Yet I felt this person had a genuine interest in helping not only women victims, but male victims too. She said her organisation consults with Mankind Initiative.

    I emailed Panorama after last night’s broadcast to ask them to look at violent female perpetrators and suggest they view this short film. It is fictional, but it depicts the experiences of a number of male survivors of domestic abuse. I recognise some of the content as being my own experience. https://vimeo.com/251323354

  3. Jennie Cummings-Knight
    Reply
    Jennie R C-Knight - October 9, 2018

    Thank you Liz for this really important corrective. I am not in the slightest bit surprised at Panorama taking the default feminist view of domestic violence, and attributing it to the patriarchal system, as society seems to be hell bent on dismantling the basic structures which underpin civilised and democratic society. They call it “deconstruction”!! We live in an era of a shaking of the foundations of the universe, and where even male and female are no longer allowed to be polar opposites but are being re-framed as fluid and interchangeable, not for a minority, but for all of mankind. Worse still, the government is endorsing the indoctrination of young children into this ideology, completely unaware of the devastating effect on the young child of inviting it to consider adult concepts from nursery age. This at a time when “safeguarding” is a buzz word too!
    The statistics about lesbian violence make for interesting reading, by the way: https://mainweb-v.musc.edu/vawprevention/lesbianrx/factsheet.shtml

  4. Reply
    Don Wright - October 9, 2018

    I am the founder of B. C. Society for Male Survivors of Sexual Abuse based in Vancouver. One of the constants in my work, training and media outreach is the importance of recognizing all incidents of sexual and domestic violence – that all victims and perpetrators must be acknowledged and opportunities for effective recovery made available. Unfortunately, there are less than a half dozen programs in all of Canada for male survivors of sexual abuse and even fewer for male victims of domestic violence. Our mandate does include male victims of IPV. I often say that it is impossible to eradicate a contagious disease by treating half the population infected with it. Domestic and sexual violence are similar to a virus in that it is the constellation of factors that result in someone committing this kind of violent act. One is not born a perpetrator. Another benefit of an all encompassing view is that it removes the genderization of these issue. I am not naive and understand the contribution of social constructs and that contribute to sexual and domestic violence. That being true, does not justify ignoring the somewhat less varieties of these criminal behaviours.
    Don Wright
    Founder – B. C. Society for Male Survivors of Sexual Abuse

  5. Reply
    Martin Seager - October 9, 2018

    Well said, Liz – I wrote to Points of View to express my concern about the imbalance and I await the BBC response (or lack of it) with bated breath!

  6. Reply
    Imanuel - November 1, 2018

    Thank you. Very correct, and a issues that impacts on a lot of families and affects children and is yet widely ignored.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top